RHD*09.03.01 - RHD*DAR3.01
(ISBT table: RHD partial D v5.0)

This entry is an RHD allele.

DAR3.1, RHD(T201R,F223V), RHD(T201R,F223V,A273A), RHD*602C>G,667T>G,819G>A, RHD*602G,667G,819A, RHD*602G,667G,819A (weak D type 4.0, DAR3.01), weak D type 4.0,
Download VCF file

Molecular data

Nucleotides: 602C>G; 667T>G; 819G>A;

Amino acids: T201R; F223V; A273A;

Hybrid allele encompassing at least one RHCE exon: no

Comments on the molecular basis:

  • additional intronic mutations detailed for one sample
  • see also "Additional comments" section on the RhesusBase http://www.rhesusbase.info/RHDweakDtype4.0.htm
  • NGS

Extracellular position of one or more amino acid substitutions:

  • none of the mutations are predicted to affect an extracellular amino acid
  • membrane localization: TM and IC

Splicing:

Unconventional prediction methods:

Phenotype

Main D phenotype: weak D (last update: Dec. 28, 2020)
Reports by D phenotype
  • D positive (apparently normal D or undetailed positive D)
    • study may overlap with 24014941
  • See also "Additional comments" section on the RhesusBase http://www.rhesusbase.info/RHDweakDtype4.0.htm
  • Undetailed ambiguous D phenotype
    • D typing discrepancies or a history of weak D phenotype
    • "weak D or questionnable D status"
    • "depressed D phenotype, discordant results between two anti-D reagents, or anti-D in individuals with a D+ phenotype"
    • discrepant or weak D typing
    • patient was enrolled in a cohort of D negative or weak D phenotypes, but is listed as D positive phenotype
  • See also "Additional comments" section on the RhesusBase http://www.rhesusbase.info/RHDweakDtype4.0.htm
  • Discrepant D phenotype (negative or positive depending on anti-D reagents and techniques)
    • listed as "partial D variant"
  • See also "Additional comments" section on the RhesusBase http://www.rhesusbase.info/RHDweakDtype4.0.htm
  • Weak D phenotype
    • ISBT classification
  • See also "Additional comments" section on the RhesusBase http://www.rhesusbase.info/RHDweakDtype4.0.htm
  • D negative
    • adosrption-elution was not performed
    • adsorption-elution was not performed
  • See also "Additional comments" section on the RhesusBase http://www.rhesusbase.info/RHDweakDtype4.0.htm
Other RH phenotypes: RH:-2, -3, -30,
  • RH:-2 inferred from the reported RHCE phenotypes of the carriers
  • RH:-3 inferred from the reported RHCE phenotypes of the carriers
  • RH:-30
Serology with monoclonal anti-D
  • 0 monoclonal IgG anti-D non-reactive with variant, out of 60 monoclonal IgG anti 22 IgM anti-D tested
  • 0 monoclonal IgG anti-D non-reactive with variant, tested with Diagast Dscreen kit
  • tested with a panel of anti-D but results not detailed
  • only a few anti-D tested
  • 0 monoclonal IgG anti-D non-reactive with variant, out of 22 monoclonal IgG tested (Table 2)
  • 0 monoclonal IgG anti-D non-reactive with variant, out of 23 monoclonal IgG anti-D tested; sample used as weak D control
  • 1 monoclonal IgG anti-D non-reactive with variant, 12 monoclonal IgG anti-D tested, sample used as control (Table S2)
Antigen Density (Ag/RBC)
  • 2288 Ag/RBC, derived from the results obtained with 59 of the 59 monoclonal IgG anti-D tested
  • 1617 Ag/RBC, median for 1 sample with 11 IgG anti-D
  • 1958 Ag/RBC, 1 sample used as control, with 12 anti-D (Table S1)
  • 1689 Ag/RBC, with 6 monoclonal IgG anti-D; used as control (data reproduced from 19309476)
  • 1624 Ag/RBC, 1 sample, 2 monoclonal anti-D
  • 1862 Ag/RBC, 1 sample, 2 monoclonal anti-D
  • 1970 Ag/RBC, 1 sample, 2 monoclonal anti-D
  • 2554 Ag/RBC, 1 sample, 2 monoclonal anti-D
  • range: 1687 - 2406, median: 1872 Ag/RBC, with 6 IgG anti-D; 7 RH:1,-2,-3,4,5 samples tested (table 3, listed as "weak D type 4", assumed RHef00313, considering the Ag density of RHef00315 clearly listed in Table 5)
  • Ag/RBC, epitope density profile with 59 monoclonal IgG anti-D (Figure 1)
  • mean: 3163 Ag/RBC, 5 samples; Ag density estimated from a measure with a single monoclonal IgG anti-D, compared to a RH:1,2,3,4,5 control sample with an antigen density assumed to be about 27.500 Ag/RBC
More phenotype data
Rhesus Similarity Index

  • 0.36 (derived from the results obtained with 59 of the 59 monoclonal IgG anti-D tested)

Haplotype

Main CcEe phenotype association: ce (last update: Dec. 28, 2020)
Number of samples reported by haplotype
ce Ce cE CE
ce 225 1 0 0
Ce 0 1 0
cE 0 0
CE 0
Reports by CcEe phenotype
  • with ce
    • 1 sample (1 sample used as control, may have been included in other studies) (sample heterozygous with RHef00301)
    10 samples
    5 samples (haplotype given, not complete phenotype)
    12 samples
    11 samples
    2 samples
    0 samples (16 samples could be RHef00442 associated with RHef00058 or, less likely, RHef00313 associated with RHef00056) (no sample count possible) (haplotype given, not complete phenotype; presented as a general association) (Figure 2; presented as a general association, no sample count)
    51 samples (haplotype given, not complete phenotype)
    4 samples
    47 samples
    82 samples (haplotype listed, not complete phenotype)
  • with Ccee
    • 1 sample (heterozygous with RHef00452) (not counted, but 3 samples could be RHef00442 associated with RHef00058 or, less likely, RHef00313 associated with RHef00056)
  • with CcEe
    • 1 sample (1 sample, heterozygous with RHef00059)
  • with ccEe
    • 0 samples (not counted, but 2 samples could be RHef00442 associated with RHef00058 or, less likely, RHef00313 associated with RHef00056)
Main allele association: RHCE*01.20.01 (RHCE*733G), RHCE*ceCF
Reports by allele association
  • RHCE*ce105T,733G,744C,1025T
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ceCF or RHCE*02
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*02 or RHCE*ce105T,733G,744C,1025T
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*01.20.01 (RHCE*733G)
    • 3 samples
    • 15 samples
    • 2 samples
  • RHCE*01
    • 1 sample
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ceTI
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ce733G or RHCE*ce48C
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ce48C,733G
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ceAG
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*02 or RHCE*ce48,733,1006
    • 2 samples
  • RHCE*ce733G or RHCE*ce48,733,1006
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ceVS.02 or RHCE*ce.01
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ceVS.02(900T) or RHCE*ce
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ceVS.04 or RHCE*ce
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ceVS.04 or RHCE*ceAG
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*DAR3.1(31T) or RHCE*ceCF
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ceCF or RHCE*ce.16
    • 1 sample
  • RHCE*ce.16

Alloimmunization

Antibodies in carriers
Antibody specificity: D (RH1)
Summary: maybe allo-anti-D? (last update: Dec. 28, 2020)
Detailed information
    Pham BN et al. Immunohematology (2013)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-): 6
  • Number listed as allo-: 1
  • Number listed as auto-: 2
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed: 47
  • DAT: 4 negative, 1 positive
  • Autologuous control: 4 negative, 1 positive
  • Elution: 3 negative, 1 positive (anti-D), 1 not tested
  • Autoadsorption: 1 not autoadsorbable, 2 auto-adsorbable, 2 not tested
  • Titer: ND
  • Was anti-LW excluded?: ND
  • Other antibodies detected: ND
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types): ND
  • Transfusion history: 2/9 potentially exposed through transfusion, including the patient with allo-anti-D
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history: ND
  • Context: ND
  • Hemolytic consequences: ND
  • Comment: 9 anti-D in 47 individuals with this allele, 1 was allo-anti-D, 2 were auto-anti-D, 2 cases could not be concluded from the incomplete serologic data, 4 were not tested due to recent transfusion
    Sandler SG et al. Transfusion (2015)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-):
  • Number listed as allo-: 1
  • Number listed as auto-:
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed: 16
  • DAT:
  • Autologuous control:
  • Elution:
  • Autoadsorption:
  • Titer:
  • Was anti-LW excluded?:
  • Other antibodies detected:
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types):
  • Transfusion history:
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history:
  • Context:
  • Hemolytic consequences:
  • Comment:
    Yu X et al. Transfusion (2006)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-):
  • Number listed as allo-:
  • Number listed as auto-:
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed:
  • DAT:
  • Autologuous control:
  • Elution:
  • Autoadsorption:
  • Titer:
  • Was anti-LW excluded?:
  • Other antibodies detected:
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types):
  • Transfusion history:
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history:
  • Context:
  • Hemolytic consequences:
  • Comment: "D+ transfusion of RHef00313 and RHef00315 recipients must occur frequently, and anti-D immunizations in these phenotypes must be rare"
    Dezan MR et al. Blood Cells Mol Dis (2017)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-):
  • Number listed as allo-: 1 sample, heterozygous with RHef00442 in trans
  • Number listed as auto-:
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed:
  • DAT: 46.2% of D+ patients with anti-D in this study had positive DAT (which patients are not specified)
  • Autologuous control: ND
  • Elution: ND
  • Autoadsorption: ND
  • Titer: ND
  • Was anti-LW excluded?: ND
  • Other antibodies detected: none
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types): ND
  • Transfusion history: yes, number and phenotypes ND
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history: ND, probably none
  • Context: SCD patient
  • Hemolytic consequences:
  • Comment: 1 sample heterozygous with RHef00442, listed as probable allo-anti-D; authors underline that "self-directed anti-D may have been missed"
    Ouchari M et al. Blood Transfus (2015)
    El Housse H et al. Blood Transfus (2019)
    Westhoff CM et al. Blood Transfus (2019)
    Flegel WA et al. Blood Transfus (2019)
    Ouchari M et al. Transfusion (2018)
    Ouchari M et al. Transfus Clin Biol (2014)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-):
  • Number listed as allo-:
  • Number listed as auto-:
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed:
  • DAT:
  • Autologuous control:
  • Elution:
  • Autoadsorption:
  • Titer:
  • Was anti-LW excluded?:
  • Other antibodies detected:
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types):
  • Transfusion history:
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history:
  • Context:
  • Hemolytic consequences:
  • Comment:
    Sippert E et al. Blood Transfus (2015)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-):
  • Number listed as allo-: 4
  • Number listed as auto-:
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed:
  • DAT: ND
  • Autologuous control: ND
  • Elution: ND
  • Autoadsorption: ND
  • Titer: ND
  • Was anti-LW excluded?: ND
  • Other antibodies detected: ND
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types): ND
  • Transfusion history: yes, number and phenotypes ND
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history: ND, probably none
  • Context: among 48 SCD patients with RH antibodies despite antigen-matched transfusion protocols
  • Hemolytic consequences: none of the 13 patients with delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions or decreased survival of transfused RBCs had this allele
  • Comment: study does not detail serology for each sample, but mentions performing DAT, autologuous control, eluate studies and adsorption on autologuous RBCs to aid the differenciation of autoantibodies and alloantibodies
    Flegel WA et al. Curr Opin Hematol (2006) (some samples overlap with other reports)
    Wagner FF et al. Transfus Med Hemother (2014)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-): 3
  • Number listed as allo-:
  • Number listed as auto-:
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed: 3
  • DAT: ND
  • Autologuous control: ND
  • Elution: ND
  • Autoadsorption: ND
  • Titer: low-titer anti-D prevented the distinction between auto- and allo-anti-D
  • Was anti-LW excluded?: ND
  • Other antibodies detected: ND
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types): ND
  • Transfusion history: ND
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history: ND, probably none
  • Context: ND
  • Hemolytic consequences: ND
  • Comment: "reports of the Rhesus Immunization Registery as of June 2006"
    Chou ST et al. Blood (2013) (Patient ID 214)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-): 1 (patient heterozygous with RHef00008)
  • Number listed as allo-:
  • Number listed as auto-:
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed:
  • DAT: ND
  • Autologuous control: ND
  • Elution: ND
  • Autoadsorption: ND
  • Titer: ND
  • Was anti-LW excluded?: ND
  • Other antibodies detected: anti-C
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types): ND
  • Transfusion history: 4 RBC exposures
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history: ND, probably none
  • Context: SCD child
  • Hemolytic consequences: unknown
  • Comment:
    Chou ST et al. Blood (2013) (Patient ID 117)
  • Ab specificity: D (RH1)
  • Number (auto- or allo-): 1
  • Number listed as allo-:
  • Number listed as auto-:
  • Number of carriers of the allele assessed:
  • DAT: ND
  • Autologuous control: ND
  • Elution: ND
  • Autoadsorption: ND
  • Titer: ND
  • Was anti-LW excluded?: ND
  • Other antibodies detected: none
  • Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types): ND
  • Transfusion history: 32 RBC exposures
  • Pregnancy history:
  • Anti-D Ig history: ND, probably none
  • Context: SCD child
  • Hemolytic consequences: none
  • Comment: Anti-D not detectable after 2 months
Antibodies in D negative recipients

Alloimmunization in recipients: expected to be possible, see phenotype data

Reports

Summary: common allele, mainly in individuals of North African or African descent or compatible with such descent (last update: Dec. 28, 2020)
Detailed reports
  • 5/161 random donors with weak D phenotype; DVI samples were excluded by serologic testing in the German population (Southwestern Germany), White (Table 6)
  • 1 sample "Caucasoid", reported by a German lab
  • 5/500 500 donors with RH:1,–2,–3,4,5 phenotype among 1000 donors screened for RHD molecular variants by several PCR-SSP and exon 5 sequencing of all samples (500 R0r, 250 R1R, 250 R2r) in the German population (southwestern Germany)
  • 1/700 among 1702 samples tested for the combined presence of RHD c.602G and c.667G (700 Dutch White, 310 South African Black, 319 South African Asians, 197 Curacao Black, 176 Ethiopian Black) Dutch (White)
  • 2/167 (2 heterozygous with RHef00442; 1 more sample could be RHef00442 associated with RHef00058 or, less likely, RHef00313 associated with RHef00056) among 1702 samples tested for the combined presence of RHD c.602G and c.667G (700 Dutch White, 310 South African Black, 319 South African Asians, 197 Curacao Black, 176 Ethiopian Black) Ethiopian (Black)
  • 1/197 (heterozygous with Rhef00442) among 1702 samples tested for the combined presence of RHD c.602G and c.667G (700 Dutch White, 310 South African Black, 319 South African Asians, 197 Curacao Black, 176 Ethiopian Black) Curacao (Black)
  • 1/319 (heterozygous with Rhef00442) among 1702 samples tested for the combined presence of RHD c.602G and c.667G (700 Dutch White, 310 South African Black, 319 South African Asians, 197 Curacao Black, 176 Ethiopian Black) South African (Asian)
  • 3/310 (1 heterozygous with RHef00452, 1 with RHef00020, 1 with RHef00442; 20 more samples could be RHef00442 associated with RHef00058 or, less likely, RHef00313 associated with RHef00056) among 1702 samples tested for the combined presence of RHD c.602G and c.667G (700 Dutch White, 310 South African Black, 319 South African Asians, 197 Curacao Black, 176 Ethiopian Black) South African (Black)
  • 4/16 514 RH:1,-2,-3,4,5 random donor samples were tested for D antigen density, 16 were in the lower range of antigen density and were genotyped German
  • 1/10 (heterozygous with RHef00442) individuals with D positive phenotype Bantu, subgroup Teke, Kukuya from villages around Djambala city
  • 0 or 1/10 (1 sample could be RHef00008 heterozygous with RHef00317 or RHef00313 with RHef00056) individuals with D positive phenotype Bantu, subgroup Teke, Boma from villages in the north of Léfini river
  • 1/141 donors and patients with ambiguous D phenotype in French population
  • 1/11 pregnant women with ambiguous fetal genotyping in French population
  • 2/26 (heterozygous: one with RHef00447, the other with RHef00059) donors with "weak D or questionnable D status" explored by NGS to compare with Sanger sequencing in the Austrian population, Upper Austria
  • 2/26 (heterozygous, one with RHef00059, the other with RHef00301) donors with "weak D or questionnable D status" explored by NGS in the Austrian population, Upper Austria
  • 9/43 (prevalence among weak D) or 9/5707 (phenotypic prevalence in population) 43 patients with weak D phenotype were genotyped in a cohort of 5707 patients from a private laboratory Argentinean
  • 2/45 (prevalence among weak D phenotype) or 2/12672 (phenotypic prevalence in population) 45 patients with weak D phenotype were genotyped in a cohort of 12672 patients from a public hospital Argentinean
  • 1/448 448 donors with D negative phenotype, tested for the presence of RHD exon 10 in the Tunisian population
  • 11/50 (5 blood donors and 5 patients) 50 samples (33 donors and 17 patients) with discrepant or weak D phenotyping in the Egyptian population
  • 22 alleles in 226 patients SCD children systematically genotyped in an alloimmunization study in the USA population (Philadelphia)
  • 12/316 (2 homo- or hemizygous, 2 heterozygous with RHef00447, 1 with RHef00020, 1 with RHef00009, 6 with RHef00442) 316 (280 D positive and 36 D negative) donors were genotyped African descent (FY:-1,-2) in the French population
  • 8/220 the cohort was composed of 164 Teke-Congolese (ethnic groups: 60 Akwa, 52 Mbochi, 52 Kuyu) from Congo, 19 Mandenka from Senegal, 25 Yoruba from Nigeria, 12 Bantu from Kenya Nonpygmoid Central African
  • 8/127 the cohort was composed of 77 Tswa from Congo, 36 Biaka from Central African Republic, 14 Mbuti from Democratic Republic of the Congo Pygmoid Central African
  • 47/748 among 748 individuals with D anomaly (weak or discrepant D phenotype or anti-D in individuals with D positive phenotype), 459 had D variants "that could be named weak D" (including alleles RHef00313, RHef00317 and RHef00318, as well as RHef00197 and RHef00283), 138 had partial D, 65 had no variant, 86 were not persued further (two variant alleles or incomplete or pending analysis) in the French population
  • 81/360 (+1 heterozygous) donors with atypical D phenotype (discrepancies or reactivity weaker than 3+) Brazilian
  • 4/48 (1 sample heterozygous with RHef00452) among 48 SCD patients with RH antibodies despite antigen-matched transfusion protocols African Brazilian
  • 1/35 donors with D negative phenotype who underwent molecular analysis in the Tunisian population
  • 2/67 (heterozygous with RHef00442) among 405 random donor samples used to evaluate RHD zygosity tests (35 typed D negative, 303 typed D positive, 67 of the latter had discordant results with different methods and were sequenced) in the Tunisian population
  • 9/351 (+7 heterozygous: 6 for RHef00313 and RHef00319, 1 for RHef00288 and RHef00313) out of 351 prenatal patients with discrepant D phenotyping results (population tested 608486 patients) Canada
  • 2/100 donors with weak D phenotype Australia
  • 51/104 (prevalence among weak D) or 51/21353 (phenotypic prevalence in population) 104 with weak D phenotype were genotyped in a cohort of 21353 pregnant women admixed Brazilian
  • 2/35 (heterozygous with RHef00442) SCD patients with unexplained RH antibodies, explored by NGS sequencing in the Brazilian population (Sao Paolo)
  • 11/23 donors with weak D phenotype (among 4458 random donors, 4028 types D positive including 19 weak D phenotype, 420 typed D negative including 4 showed to be weak D by further serological testing; in total 23 donors had weak D phenotype) in the Maroccan population
  • 12/231 231 donors with weak D phenotype in the Argentinean population (Northwestern Argentina)
  • 34/273 (7 htz with RHef00605) donors with weak D phenotype in the Brazilian population
  • 4/163 (including 3 heterozygous with RHef00452) selected variants included for the development of a genotyping assay mainly in the Dutch population (samples may have been included in other studies)
  • 19/2000 4 homozygous and 15 heterozygous samples; among 2000 random donors (1777 typed D positive), all samples were genotyped for 602G and 667G, but only these 19 were fully sequenced to separate weak D type 4 subtypes in the Tunisian population (study may overlap with 24014941)
  • 63/353 (including 1 heterozygous with RHef00022) samples referred for discrepant or weak D typing in the USA population
  • 1/16,253 samples of pregnant women with D negative of weak D (2+ or less), screened for fetal RHD in the Finnish population
  • 2 heterozygotes, 5 hemizygotes among 278 samples selected for the development of nonspecific quantitative next-generation sequencing. (non-random samples, may have been reported in other studies)
Allele or phenotype frequency
  • 1/6024 (CI: 1/2695 - 1/15291) estimated population frequency among 1000 donors screened for RHD molecular variants by several PCR-SSP and exon 5 sequencing of all samples (500 R0r, 250 R1R, 250 R2r) in the German population (southwestern Germany)
  • 0.006 estimated allele frequency from a study of 1702 samples tested for the combined presence of RHD c.602G and c.667G (700 Dutch White, 310 South African Black, 319 South African Asians, 197 Curacao Black, 176 Ethiopian Black) Ethiopian (Black)
  • 0.005 estimated allele frequency from a study of 1702 samples tested for the combined presence of RHD c.602G and c.667G (700 Dutch White, 310 South African Black, 319 South African Asians, 197 Curacao Black, 176 Ethiopian Black) South African (Black)
  • 0.0016 estimated allele frequency from a study of 1702 samples tested for the combined presence of RHD c.602G and c.667G (700 Dutch White, 310 South African Black, 319 South African Asians, 197 Curacao Black, 176 Ethiopian Black) Curacao (Black)
  • 1/6060 (CI: 1/2525 - 1/17745) estimated allele frequency by testing random donor samples for D antigen density, those in the lower range of antigen density were genotyped German
  • 0.00014 estimated prevalence in the German population
  • 0.017 allele frequency among 480 African American donors African American (in the USA population)
  • 0.025 allele frequency among 140 SCD patients African American (in the USA population)
  • 0.024 allele frequency from molecular typing of 101 random samples Dogon Malian
  • 0.0094 allele frequency in 106 donors with weak D phenotype Brazilian (mixed origin, mainly between African and European descent)
  • 0.006 calculated in 16,253 samples of pregnant women with D negative of weak D (2+ or less), screened for fetal RHD in the Finnish population

2D diagram

generated using Protter extraintra Met1 Met1 Ser2 Ser2 Ser3 Ser3 Lys4 Lys4 Tyr5 Tyr5 Pro6 Pro6 Arg7 Arg7 Ser8 Ser8 Val9 Val9 Arg10 Arg10 10Arg11 Arg11 Cys12 Cys12 Leu13 Leu13 Pro14 Pro14 Leu15 Leu15 Trp16 Trp16 Ala17 Ala17 Leu18 Leu18 Thr19 Thr19 Leu20 Leu20 20Glu21 Glu21 Ala22 Ala22 Ala23 Ala23 Leu24 Leu24 Ile25 Ile25 Leu26 Leu26 Leu27 Leu27 Phe28 Phe28 Tyr29 Tyr29 Phe30 Phe30 30Phe31 Phe31 Thr32 Thr32 His33 His33 Tyr34 Tyr34 Asp35 Asp35 Ala36 Ala36 Ser37 Ser37 Leu38 Leu38 Glu39 Glu39 Asp40 Asp40 40Gln41 Gln41 Lys42 Lys42 Gly43 Gly43 Leu44 Leu44 Val45 Val45 Ala46 Ala46 Ser47 Ser47 Tyr48 Tyr48 Gln49 Gln49 Val50 Val50 50Gly51 Gly51 Gln52 Gln52 Asp53 Asp53 Leu54 Leu54 Thr55 Thr55 Val56 Val56 Met57 Met57 Ala58 Ala58 Ala59 Ala59 Ile60 Ile60 60Gly61 Gly61 Leu62 Leu62 Gly63 Gly63 Phe64 Phe64 Leu65 Leu65 Thr66 Thr66 Ser67 Ser67 Ser68 Ser68 Phe69 Phe69 Arg70 Arg70 70Arg71 Arg71 His72 His72 Ser73 Ser73 Trp74 Trp74 Ser75 Ser75 Ser76 Ser76 Val77 Val77 Ala78 Ala78 Phe79 Phe79 Asn80 Asn80 80Leu81 Leu81 Phe82 Phe82 Met83 Met83 Leu84 Leu84 Ala85 Ala85 Leu86 Leu86 Gly87 Gly87 Val88 Val88 Gln89 Gln89 Trp90 Trp90 90Ala91 Ala91 Ile92 Ile92 Leu93 Leu93 Leu94 Leu94 Asp95 Asp95 Gly96 Gly96 Phe97 Phe97 Leu98 Leu98 Ser99 Ser99 Gln100 Gln100 100Phe101 Phe101 Pro102 Pro102 Ser103 Ser103 Gly104 Gly104 Lys105 Lys105 Val106 Val106 Val107 Val107 Ile108 Ile108 Thr109 Thr109 Leu110 Leu110 110Phe111 Phe111 Ser112 Ser112 Ile113 Ile113 Arg114 Arg114 Leu115 Leu115 Ala116 Ala116 Thr117 Thr117 Met118 Met118 Ser119 Ser119 Ala120 Ala120 120Leu121 Leu121 Ser122 Ser122 Val123 Val123 Leu124 Leu124 Ile125 Ile125 Ser126 Ser126 Val127 Val127 Asp128 Asp128 Ala129 Ala129 Val130 Val130 130Leu131 Leu131 Gly132 Gly132 Lys133 Lys133 Val134 Val134 Asn135 Asn135 Leu136 Leu136 Ala137 Ala137 Gln138 Gln138 Leu139 Leu139 Val140 Val140 140Val141 Val141 Met142 Met142 Val143 Val143 Leu144 Leu144 Val145 Val145 Glu146 Glu146 Val147 Val147 Thr148 Thr148 Ala149 Ala149 Leu150 Leu150 150Gly151 Gly151 Asn152 Asn152 Leu153 Leu153 Arg154 Arg154 Met155 Met155 Val156 Val156 Ile157 Ile157 Ser158 Ser158 Asn159 Asn159 Ile160 Ile160 160Phe161 Phe161 Asn162 Asn162 Thr163 Thr163 Asp164 Asp164 Tyr165 Tyr165 His166 His166 Met167 Met167 Asn168 Asn168 Met169 Met169 Met170 Met170 170His171 His171 Ile172 Ile172 Tyr173 Tyr173 Val174 Val174 Phe175 Phe175 Ala176 Ala176 Ala177 Ala177 Tyr178 Tyr178 Phe179 Phe179 Gly180 Gly180 180Leu181 Leu181 Ser182 Ser182 Val183 Val183 Ala184 Ala184 Trp185 Trp185 Cys186 Cys186 Leu187 Leu187 Pro188 Pro188 Lys189 Lys189 Pro190 Pro190 190Leu191 Leu191 Pro192 Pro192 Glu193 Glu193 Gly194 Gly194 Thr195 Thr195 Glu196 Glu196 Asp197 Asp197 Lys198 Lys198 Asp199 Asp199 Gln200 Gln200 200Thr201 Thr201 Ala202 Ala202 Thr203 Thr203 Ile204 Ile204 Pro205 Pro205 Ser206 Ser206 Leu207 Leu207 Ser208 Ser208 Ala209 Ala209 Met210 Met210 210Leu211 Leu211 Gly212 Gly212 Ala213 Ala213 Leu214 Leu214 Phe215 Phe215 Leu216 Leu216 Trp217 Trp217 Met218 Met218 Phe219 Phe219 Trp220 Trp220 220Pro221 Pro221 Ser222 Ser222 Phe223 Phe223 Asn224 Asn224 Ser225 Ser225 Ala226 Ala226 Leu227 Leu227 Leu228 Leu228 Arg229 Arg229 Ser230 Ser230 230Pro231 Pro231 Ile232 Ile232 Glu233 Glu233 Arg234 Arg234 Lys235 Lys235 Asn236 Asn236 Ala237 Ala237 Val238 Val238 Phe239 Phe239 Asn240 Asn240 240Thr241 Thr241 Tyr242 Tyr242 Tyr243 Tyr243 Ala244 Ala244 Val245 Val245 Ala246 Ala246 Val247 Val247 Ser248 Ser248 Val249 Val249 Val250 Val250 250Thr251 Thr251 Ala252 Ala252 Ile253 Ile253 Ser254 Ser254 Gly255 Gly255 Ser256 Ser256 Ser257 Ser257 Leu258 Leu258 Ala259 Ala259 His260 His260 260Pro261 Pro261 Gln262 Gln262 Gly263 Gly263 Lys264 Lys264 Ile265 Ile265 Ser266 Ser266 Lys267 Lys267 Thr268 Thr268 Tyr269 Tyr269 Val270 Val270 270His271 His271 Ser272 Ser272 Ala273 Ala273 Val274 Val274 Leu275 Leu275 Ala276 Ala276 Gly277 Gly277 Gly278 Gly278 Val279 Val279 Ala280 Ala280 280Val281 Val281 Gly282 Gly282 Thr283 Thr283 Ser284 Ser284 Cys285 Cys285 His286 His286 Leu287 Leu287 Ile288 Ile288 Pro289 Pro289 Ser290 Ser290 290Pro291 Pro291 Trp292 Trp292 Leu293 Leu293 Ala294 Ala294 Met295 Met295 Val296 Val296 Leu297 Leu297 Gly298 Gly298 Leu299 Leu299 Val300 Val300 300Ala301 Ala301 Gly302 Gly302 Leu303 Leu303 Ile304 Ile304 Ser305 Ser305 Val306 Val306 Gly307 Gly307 Gly308 Gly308 Ala309 Ala309 Lys310 Lys310 310Tyr311 Tyr311 Leu312 Leu312 Pro313 Pro313 Gly314 Gly314 Cys315 Cys315 Cys316 Cys316 Asn317 Asn317 Arg318 Arg318 Val319 Val319 Leu320 Leu320 320Gly321 Gly321 Ile322 Ile322 Pro323 Pro323 His324 His324 Ser325 Ser325 Ser326 Ser326 Ile327 Ile327 Met328 Met328 Gly329 Gly329 Tyr330 Tyr330 330Asn331 Asn331 Phe332 Phe332 Ser333 Ser333 Leu334 Leu334 Leu335 Leu335 Gly336 Gly336 Leu337 Leu337 Leu338 Leu338 Gly339 Gly339 Glu340 Glu340 340Ile341 Ile341 Ile342 Ile342 Tyr343 Tyr343 Ile344 Ile344 Val345 Val345 Leu346 Leu346 Leu347 Leu347 Val348 Val348 Leu349 Leu349 Asp350 Asp350 350Thr351 Thr351 Val352 Val352 Gly353 Gly353 Ala354 Ala354 Gly355 Gly355 Asn356 Asn356 Gly357 Gly357 Met358 Met358 Ile359 Ile359 Gly360 Gly360 360Phe361 Phe361 Gln362 Gln362 Val363 Val363 Leu364 Leu364 Leu365 Leu365 Ser366 Ser366 Ile367 Ile367 Gly368 Gly368 Glu369 Glu369 Leu370 Leu370 370Ser371 Ser371 Leu372 Leu372 Ala373 Ala373 Ile374 Ile374 Val375 Val375 Ile376 Ile376 Ala377 Ala377 Leu378 Leu378 Met379 Met379 Ser380 Ser380 380Gly381 Gly381 Leu382 Leu382 Leu383 Leu383 Thr384 Thr384 Gly385 Gly385 Leu386 Leu386 Leu387 Leu387 Leu388 Leu388 Asn389 Asn389 Leu390 Leu390 390Lys391 Lys391 Ile392 Ile392 Trp393 Trp393 Lys394 Lys394 Ala395 Ala395 Pro396 Pro396 His397 His397 Glu398 Glu398 Ala399 Ala399 Lys400 Lys400 400Tyr401 Tyr401 Phe402 Phe402 Asp403 Asp403 Asp404 Asp404 Gln405 Gln405 Val406 Val406 Phe407 Phe407 Trp408 Trp408 Lys409 Lys409 Phe410 Phe410 410Pro411 Pro411 His412 His412 Leu413 Leu413 Ala414 Ala414 Val415 Val415 Gly416 Gly416 Phe417 Phe417 417 MSSKYPRSVRRCLPLWALTLEAALILLFYFFTHYDASLEDQKGLVASYQVGQDLTVMAAIGLGFLTSSFRRHSWSSVAFNLFMLALGVQWAILLDGFLSQFPSGKVVITLFSIRLATMSALSVLISVDAVLGKVNLAQLVVMVLVEVTALGNLRMVISNIFNTDYHMNMMHIYVFAAYFGLSVAWCLPKPLPEGTEDKDQTATIPSLSAMLGALFLWMFWPSFNSALLRSPIERKNAVFNTYYAVAVSVVTAISGSSLAHPQGKISKTYVHSAVLAGGVAVGTSCHLIPSPWLAMVLGLVAGLISVGGAKYLPGCCNRVLGIPHSSIMGYNFSLLGLLGEIIYIVLLVLDTVGAGNGMIGFQVLLSIGELSLAIVIALMSGLLTGLLLNLKIWKAPHEAKYFDDQVFWKFPHLAVGF MSSKYPRSVRRCLPLWALTLEAALILLFYFFTHYDASLEDQKGLVASYQVGQDLTVMAAIGLGFLTSSFRRHSWSSVAFNLFMLALGVQWAILLDGFLSQFPSGKVVITLFSIRLATMSALSVLISVDAVLGKVNLAQLVVMVLVEVTALGNLRMVISNIFNTDYHMNMMHIYVFAAYFGLSVAWCLPKPLPEGTEDKDQTATIPSLSAMLGALFLWMFWPSFNSALLRSPIERKNAVFNTYYAVAVSVVTAISGSSLAHPQGKISKTYVHSAVLAGGVAVGTSCHLIPSPWLAMVLGLVAGLISVGGAKYLPGCCNRVLGIPHSSIMGYNFSLLGLLGEIIYIVLLVLDTVGAGNGMIGFQVLLSIGELSLAIVIALMSGLLTGLLLNLKIWKAPHEAKYFDDQVFWKFPHLAVGF MSSKYPRSVRRCLPLWALTLEAALILLFYFFTHYDASLEDQKGLVASYQVGQDLTVMAAIGLGFLTSSFRRHSWSSVAFNLFMLALGVQWAILLDGFLSQFPSGKVVITLFSIRLATMSALSVLISVDAVLGKVNLAQLVVMVLVEVTALGNLRMVISNIFNTDYHMNMMHIYVFAAYFGLSVAWCLPKPLPEGTEDKDQTATIPSLSAMLGALFLWMFWPSFNSALLRSPIERKNAVFNTYYAVAVSVVTAISGSSLAHPQGKISKTYVHSAVLAGGVAVGTSCHLIPSPWLAMVLGLVAGLISVGGAKYLPGCCNRVLGIPHSSIMGYNFSLLGLLGEIIYIVLLVLDTVGAGNGMIGFQVLLSIGELSLAIVIALMSGLLTGLLLNLKIWKAPHEAKYFDDQVFWKFPHLAVGF MSSKYPRSVRRCLPLWALTLEAALILLFYFFTHYDASLEDQKGLVASYQVGQDLTVMAAIGLGFLTSSFRRHSWSSVAFNLFMLALGVQWAILLDGFLSQFPSGKVVITLFSIRLATMSALSVLISVDAVLGKVNLAQLVVMVLVEVTALGNLRMVISNIFNTDYHMNMMHIYVFAAYFGLSVAWCLPKPLPEGTEDKDQTATIPSLSAMLGALFLWMFWPSFNSALLRSPIERKNAVFNTYYAVAVSVVTAISGSSLAHPQGKISKTYVHSAVLAGGVAVGTSCHLIPSPWLAMVLGLVAGLISVGGAKYLPGCCNRVLGIPHSSIMGYNFSLLGLLGEIIYIVLLVLDTVGAGNGMIGFQVLLSIGELSLAIVIALMSGLLTGLLLNLKIWKAPHEAKYFDDQVFWKFPHLAVGF

Structure mapping

Movement    Mouse Input    Touch Input
RotationPrimary Mouse ButtonSingle touch
TranslationMiddle Mouse Button or Ctrl+PrimaryTriple touch
ZoomScroll Wheel or Second Mouse Button or Shift+PrimaryPinch (double touch)
SlabCtrl+SecondNot Available

Links

The Human RhesusBase
Genbank: KR260901 KR260900 KY075648
Erythrogene

References

  1. International Society of Blood Transfusion et al. International Society of Blood Transfusion (ISBT) allele table Online ressource, 1935. — Online ressource — [RHeference]
  2. Wagner FF et al. Molecular basis of weak D phenotypes. Blood, 1999. [Citation] [RHeference]
  3. Hemker MB et al. DAR, a new RhD variant involving exons 4, 5, and 7, often in linkage with ceAR, a new Rhce variant frequently found in African blacks. Blood, 1999. [Citation] [RHeference]
  4. Wagner FF et al. Weak D alleles express distinct phenotypes. Blood, 2000. [Citation] [RHeference]
  5. Singleton BK et al. The presence of an RHD pseudogene containing a 37 base pair duplication and a nonsense mutation in africans with the Rh D-negative blood group phenotype. Blood, 2000. [Citation] [RHeference]
  6. Müller TH et al. PCR screening for common weak D types shows different distributions in three Central European populations. Transfusion, 2001. [Citation] [RHeference]
  7. Wagner FF et al. The DAU allele cluster of the RHD gene. Blood, 2002. [Citation] [RHeference]
  8. Perco P et al. Testing for the D zygosity with three different methods revealed altered Rhesus boxes and a new weak D type. Transfusion, 2003. [Citation] [RHeference]
  9. Körmöczi GF et al. Novel weak D types 31 and 32: adsorption-elution-supported D antigen analysis and comparison to prevalent weak D types. Transfusion, 2005. [Citation] [RHeference]
  10. Chen Q et al. Random survey for RHD alleles among D+ European persons. Transfusion, 2005. [Citation] [RHeference]
  11. Yu X et al. Outliers in RhD membrane integration are explained by variant RH haplotypes. Transfusion, 2006. [Citation] [RHeference]
  12. Grootkerk-Tax MG et al. RHD(T201R, F223V) cluster analysis in five different ethnic groups and serologic characterization of a new Ethiopian variant DARE, the DIII type 6, and the RHD(F223V). Transfusion, 2006. [Citation] [RHeference]
  13. Flegel WA et al. How I manage donors and patients with a weak D phenotype. Curr Opin Hematol, 2006. [Citation] [RHeference]
  14. Flegel WA et al. D variants at the RhD vestibule in the weak D type 4 and Eurasian D clusters. Transfusion, 2009. [Citation] [RHeference]
  15. Touinssi M et al. Molecular analysis of inactive and active RHD alleles in native Congolese cohorts. Transfusion, 2009. [Citation] [RHeference]
  16. Wagner FF and Flegel WA et al. The Human RhesusBase Online ressource, 2011. — Online ressource — [RHeference]
  17. Silvy M et al. Weak D and DEL alleles detected by routine SNaPshot genotyping: identification of four novel RHD alleles. Transfusion, 2011. [Citation] [RHeference]
  18. Stabentheiner S et al. Overcoming methodical limits of standard RHD genotyping by next-generation sequencing. Vox Sang, 2011. [Citation] [RHeference]
  19. Brajovich ME et al. Comprehensive analysis of RHD alleles in Argentineans with variant D phenotypes. Transfusion, 2012. [Citation] [RHeference]
  20. Moussa H et al. Molecular background of D-negative phenotype in the Tunisian population. Transfus Med, 2012. [Citation] [RHeference]
  21. Granier T et al. A comprehensive survey of both RHD and RHCE allele frequencies in sub-Saharan Africa. Transfusion, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
  22. Pham BN et al. Molecular analysis of patients with weak D and serologic analysis of those with anti-D (excluding type 1 and type 2). Immunohematology, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
  23. Chou ST et al. High prevalence of red blood cell alloimmunization in sickle cell disease despite transfusion from Rh-matched minority donors. Blood, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
  24. Reid ME et al. The low-prevalence Rh antigen STEM (RH49) is encoded by two different RHCE*ce818T alleles that are often in cis to RHD*DOL. Transfusion, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
  25. O'Suoji C et al. Alloimmunization in sickle cell anemia in the era of extended red cell typing. Pediatr Blood Cancer, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
  26. von Zabern I et al. D category IV: a group of clinically relevant and phylogenetically diverse partial D. Transfusion, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
  27. Abdelrazik AM et al. Combining serology and molecular typing of weak D role in improving D typing strategy in Egypt. Transfusion, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
  28. Haer-Wigman L et al. RHD and RHCE variant and zygosity genotyping via multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Transfusion, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
  29. Reid ME et al. Genomic analyses of RH alleles to improve transfusion therapy in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood Cells Mol Dis, 2014. [Citation] [RHeference]
  30. Wagner FF et al. The Rhesus Site. Transfus Med Hemother, 2014. [Citation] [RHeference]
  31. Arnoni CP et al. How do we identify RHD variants using a practical molecular approach? Transfusion, 2014. [Citation] [RHeference]
  32. Ouchari M et al. Anti-D auto-immunization in a patient with weak D type 4.0. Transfus Clin Biol, 2014. [Citation] [RHeference]
  33. Kappler-Gratias S et al. Systematic RH genotyping and variant identification in French donors of African origin. Blood Transfus, 2014. [Citation] [RHeference]
  34. Sippert E et al. Variant RH alleles and Rh immunisation in patients with sickle cell disease. Blood Transfus, 2015. [Citation] [RHeference]
  35. Kacem N et al. Paternal RHD zygosity determination in Tunisians: evaluation of three molecular tests. Blood Transfus, 2015. [Citation] [RHeference]
  36. Sandler SG et al. It's time to phase in RHD genotyping for patients with a serologic weak D phenotype. College of American Pathologists Transfusion Medicine Resource Committee Work Group. Transfusion, 2015. [Citation] [RHeference]
  37. Ouchari M et al. Weak D in the Tunisian population. Blood Transfus, 2015. [Citation] [RHeference]
  38. Ba A et al. RH diversity in Mali: characterization of a new haplotype RHD*DIVa/RHCE*ceTI(D2). Transfusion, 2015. [Citation] [RHeference]
  39. Clarke G et al. Resolving variable maternal D typing using serology and genotyping in selected prenatal patients. Transfusion, 2016. [Citation] [RHeference]
  40. Srivastava K et al. The DAU cluster: a comparative analysis of 18 RHD alleles, some forming partial D antigens. Transfusion, 2016. [Citation] [RHeference]
  41. Ouchari M et al. Serologic and molecular characterization of weak D type 29. Transfusion, 2017. [Citation] [RHeference]
  42. Floch A et al. Molecular characterization of 13 new RHD alleles. Transfusion, 2017. [Citation] [RHeference]
  43. S Vege et al. RHD Genotyping of Discrepant or Weak D Samples: Over a Year’s Experience. Transfusion, 2017. — Abstract — [RHeference]
  44. McGowan EC et al. Diverse and novel RHD variants in Australian blood donors with a weak D phenotype: implication for transfusion management. Vox Sang, 2017. [Citation] [RHeference]
  45. Dezan MR et al. RHD and RHCE genotyping by next-generation sequencing is an effective strategy to identify molecular variants within sickle cell disease patients. Blood Cells Mol Dis, 2017. [Citation] [RHeference]
  46. Chou ST et al. Whole-exome sequencing for RH genotyping and alloimmunization risk in children with sickle cell anemia. Blood Adv, 2017. [Citation] [RHeference]
  47. Bub CB et al. RHD alleles among pregnant women with serologic discrepant weak D phenotypes from a multiethnic population and risk of alloimmunization. J Clin Lab Anal, 2018. [Citation] [RHeference]
  48. Ouchari M et al. Transfusion strategy for weak D Type 4.0 based on RHD alleles and RH haplotypes in Tunisia. Transfusion, 2018. [Citation] [RHeference]
  49. Dezan MR et al. High frequency of variant RHD genotypes among donors and patients of mixed origin with serologic weak-D phenotype. J Clin Lab Anal, 2018. [Citation] [RHeference]
  50. Flegel WA et al. A proposal for a rational transfusion strategy in patients of European and North African descent with weak D type 4.0 and 4.1 phenotypes. Blood Transfus, 2019. [Citation] [RHeference]
  51. Trucco Boggione C et al. Characterization of RHD locus polymorphism in D negative and D variant donors from Northwestern Argentina. Transfusion, 2019. [Citation] [RHeference]
  52. El Housse H et al. Comprehensive phenotypic and molecular investigation of RhD and RhCE variants in Moroccan blood donors. Blood Transfus, 2019. [Citation] [RHeference]
  53. Arnoni CP et al. Correlation among automated scores of agglutination, antigen density by flow cytometry and genetics of D variants. Transfus Apher Sci, 2019. [Citation] [RHeference]
  54. Westhoff CM et al. Experience with RHD*weak D type 4.0 in the USA. Blood Transfus, 2019. [Citation] [RHeference]
  55. Stef M et al. RH genotyping by nonspecific quantitative next-generation sequencing. Transfusion, 2020. [Citation] [RHeference]
  56. Floch A et al. Comment from Rheference Online ressource, 2020. — Online ressource — [RHeference]
  57. Tammi SM et al. Next-generation sequencing of 35 RHD variants in 16 253 serologically D- pregnant women in the Finnish population. Blood Adv, 2020. [Citation] [RHeference]
  58. Vege S et al. Impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in Denmark and the United States and identification of novel RHD alleles. Transfusion, 2021. [Citation] [RHeference]

Last update: Jan. 8, 2021