DFR - phenotypic description
(ISBT table: not listed)
This entry is a phenotypic characterization.
DFR - phenotypic description,
Molecular data
Nucleotides:
Amino acids:
Hybrid allele encompassing at least one RHCE exon:
NA
Comments on the molecular basis:
- phenotype associated with RHef00041 and RHef00042
- molecular typing not specified, assumed phenotypic characterization
Extracellular position of one or more amino acid substitutions:
Splicing:
Unconventional prediction methods:
Phenotype
Main D phenotype: variable/discrepant (last update: June 16, 2020)Reports by D phenotype
Other RH phenotypes: RH:-8, -9, -20, -23, -30, -32, -33, -37, -40, -48, 50, -52, -54,
Serology with monoclonal anti-D
- cross-testing table between different D categories; for one proband, RBCs tested positive with anti-D from RHef00580, RHef00585 and RHef00586 individuals, negative with anti-D from RHef00588, RHef00589, RHef00578, RHef00747, RHef00591, and RHef00581 individuals
- 4 anti-D non-reactive with variant, out of 10 anti-D tested (9 monoclonal IgG)
- 20 IgG anti-D tested, epitope pattern table included
- 1 sample tested; reactive (2+ to 4+) with LOR-15C9 Ab
- 1 anti-D non-reactive with variant, out of 5 monoclonal anti-D tested; one polyclonal anti-D was also tested (Table 1)
- epitope pattern
(reproduced from
9018785 ) (Table 1) - tested with monoclonal anti-D; epitope pattern
Antigen Density (Ag/RBC)
More phenotype data
Rhesus Similarity Index
Haplotype
Main CcEe phenotype association: Ce (last update: Feb. 18, 2020)Alloimmunization
Antibodies in carriers
Antibody specificity: D (RH1)
Summary: not relevant, see types or alleles (last update: Aug. 25, 2020)Detailed information
-
Tippett P et al. Vox Sang (1996)
- Ab specificity: D (RH1)
- Number (auto- or allo-): 1
- Number listed as allo-:
- Number listed as auto-:
- Number of carriers of the allele assessed:
- DAT:
- Autologuous control:
- Elution:
- Autoadsorption:
- Titer:
- Was anti-LW excluded?:
- Other antibodies detected:
- Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types):
- Transfusion history:
- Pregnancy history:
- Anti-D Ig history:
- Context:
- Hemolytic consequences:
- Comment:
Ansart-Pirenne H et al. Transfusion (2004)
-
Lomas C et al. Transfusion (1994)
- Ab specificity: D (RH1)
- Number (auto- or allo-): 2
- Number listed as allo-:
- Number listed as auto-:
- Number of carriers of the allele assessed:
- DAT: ND
- Autologuous control: ND
- Elution: ND
- Autoadsorption: ND
- Titer: ND
- Was anti-LW excluded?: ND
- Other antibodies detected: ND
- Cross matches (with Ab and RBCs from different partial types): For one proband, RBCs tested positive with anti-D from RHef00580, RHef00585 and RHef00586 individuals, negative with anti-D from RHef00588, RHef00589, RHef00578, RHef00747, RHef00591, and RHef00581 individuals
- Transfusion history: ND
- Pregnancy history:
- Anti-D Ig history: ND, probably none
- Context: ND
- Hemolytic consequences: ND
- Comment:
Antibodies in D negative recipients
Alloimmunization in recipients: expected to be possible, see phenotype data
Reports
Summary: NA, NA (last update: Aug. 25, 2020)Detailed reports
- 2/3967 R1r, R2r and R0r donors in Australian population
- 3 samples with suspected DFR phenotype, sent for confirmation sent by an Australian lab (Sydney)
- 1 sample with suspected DFR phenotype, sent for confirmation sent by a UK lab (Lancaster)
- 9 samples reported by a UK lab, London
- 23/342 out of 342 D samples sent for D phenotyping (76 were too weak for epitope determination and classification, only half of the remaining could be classified)
- 10 to 30 samples among the propositi tested by the authors White
- 5/168 among 168 samples referred for weak D phenotype and/or allo anti-D in D positive individuals, 137 were characterized in the study (70 by serology, 67 by molecular analysis, 31 could not be typed because serologic typing was inconclusive and molecular typing could not be performed) in the French population (Caucasian)
- 1/55162 among samples C or E positive and positive for "Du test" (55162 samples were typed; 314 were ddCcee, with 63 positive for "Du test" and 154 were ddccEe, with 30 positive for "Du test"; of the 93 "Du positive", 60 underwent molecular analysis) in the French population
Allele or phenotype frequency
Structure mapping
Movement | Mouse Input | Touch Input | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Rotation | Primary Mouse Button | Single touch | ||
Translation | Middle Mouse Button or Ctrl+Primary | Triple touch | ||
Zoom | Scroll Wheel or Second Mouse Button or Shift+Primary | Pinch (double touch) | ||
Slab | Ctrl+Second | Not Available |
References
- Lomas C et al. FPTT is a low-incidence Rh antigen associated with a "new" partial Rh D phenotype, DFR. Transfusion, 1994. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Tippett P et al. The Rh antigen D: partial D antigens and associated low incidence antigens. Vox Sang, 1996. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Cartron JP et al. Tentative model for the mapping of D epitopes on the RhD polypeptide. Transfus Clin Biol, 1996. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Jones JW et al. Quantitation of Rh D antigen sites on weak D and D variant red cells by flow cytometry. Vox Sang, 1996. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Jones J et al. Selection of monoclonal antibodies for the identification of D variants: ability to detect weak D and to split epD2, epD5 and epD6/7. Vox Sang, 1996. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Scott M et al. Rh serology--coordinator's report. Transfus Clin Biol, 1996. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Avent ND et al. Evidence of genetic diversity underlying Rh D-, weak D (Du), and partial D phenotypes as determined by multiplex polymerase chain reaction analysis of the RHD gene. Blood, 1997. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Reid ME et al. Use of LOR-15C9 monoclonal anti-D to differentiate erythrocytes with the partial DvI antigen from those with either partial D antigens or weak D antigens. Immunohematology, 1998. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Wagner FF et al. A D(V)-like phenotype is obliterated by A226P in the partial D DBS. Transfusion, 2001. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Reid ME et al. DAK, a new low-incidence antigen in the Rh blood group system. Transfusion, 2003. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Ansart-Pirenne H et al. RhD variants in Caucasians: consequences for checking clinically relevant alleles. Transfusion, 2004. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Noizat-Pirenne F et al. Weak D phenotypes and transfusion safety: where do we stand in daily practice? Transfusion, 2007. [Citation] [RHeference]
- Haer-Wigman L et al. RHD and RHCE variant and zygosity genotyping via multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification. Transfusion, 2013. [Citation] [RHeference]
Last update: Nov. 16, 2020